top of page
volunteering-3287867.jpg

DIREKTION Capability Gaps 
for Disaster & Crisis Management

A practitioner-led view of where capabilities fall short today and what will be needed

53dfb7cf-1f3b-49ff-92d6-9dc04bbf49f1.jpg

How DIREKTION assessed capability gaps (3-cycle approach)

2025-12-22_10h53_31.png

Existing current capability gaps

A shared baseline of current gaps, grounded in consultation with responder organisations, analysis of operational practices, and review of relevant EU-funded outcomes.

2025-12-22_10h54_18.png

Remaining prioritised gaps

A refinement of gaps that remain unresolved despite existing initiatives, using deeper stakeholder engagement and prioritisation to understand persistence drivers (e.g., operational fit, legal constraints, lack of validation pathways)..

2025-12-22_10h54_57.png

Future capability gaps for 2035+

A forward-looking assessment using foresight workshops and scenario-based methods (STEEPL + POSTEDFIT) to identify capability needs that are likely to intensify under climate, societal, technological, and legal transformations.

Six cross-cutting themes

Across all cycles, capability gaps consistently converge into six overarching themes that affect disaster response effectiveness and innovation uptake.

CGs.png
954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Interoperability and information sharing remain a fundamental challenge across all cycles. This theme originates from recurrent findings in D2.1 related to fragmented communication, incompatible systems and unclear information flows between agencies and jurisdictions. D2.2 confirms that these gaps persist as priority issues, while D2.3 highlights that increasing system complexity will further amplify interoperability challenges if not addressed systematically.

Interoperability & Information Sharing.png

Interoperability & information sharing (systems, standards, cross-border operations)

954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Technology uptake and operational validation emerge as a critical theme, rooted in the observation that many innovative solutions exist but are not effectively adopted by responder organisations. D2.1 identifies barriers related to maturity, usability and operational fit, while D2.2 highlights the lack of structured validation, testing and certification pathways. From a future perspective, D2.3 underlines the need for trusted and field-ready technologies to support increasingly complex response scenarios.

noun-configuration-7362687.png

Technology uptake & operational validation (maturity, usability, certification/testing pathways)

954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Data integration and decision support represent a cross-cutting capability gap throughout all three cycles. Initial findings in D2.1 point to limited situational awareness due to fragmented or overwhelming data streams. D2.2 reinforces this by identifying persistent difficulties in integrating and validating data from multiple sources. Looking ahead, D2.3 stresses that effective decision-making will increasingly depend on advanced analytics, real-time data integration and explainable decision-support tools.

Data Integration & Decision Support.png

Data integration & decision support (multi-source validation, analytics, explainability)

954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Multi-stakeholder collaboration is identified as a structural capability gap, reflecting the growing need for coordinated action between responders, authorities, industry, researchers and citizens. While D2.1 highlights challenges in coordination and role clarity, D2.2 shows that collaboration gaps remain a priority, particularly in the context of innovation uptake and joint operations. D2.3 further expands this theme by emphasising the importance of inclusive governance models to address complex and systemic risks.

Multi- stakeholder Collaboration.png

Multi-stakeholder collaboration (responders, authorities, industry, researchers, citizens)

954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Skills, training and workforce development form a recurring theme across all cycles. D2.1 identifies gaps in training related to new technologies and complex operational environments. D2.2 confirms that insufficient skills and limited joint training opportunities hinder effective collaboration and technology adoption. From a long-term perspective, D2.3 highlights the growing need for continuous upskilling, digital literacy and adaptive training models to prepare responders for future challenges.

Skills, Training & Workforce Development.png

Skills, training & workforce development (joint training, digital literacy, adaptive models)

954b3924-0b8c-49d0-8497-642ea9a8e3e7.jpg

Future-proofing capabilities for emerging risks captures the forward-looking dimension of the WP2 analysis. While D2.1 and D2.2 primarily focus on current and near-term gaps, D2.3 extends the assessment to long-term challenges driven by climate change, cascading crises, digitalisation and societal change. This theme underscores the need for anticipatory capability development and strategic planning beyond immediate operational needs.

Future-proofing for Emerging Risks.png

Future-proofing for emerging risks (cascading crises, digitalisation, societal change)

What we mean by “capability gaps”?

 

Capability gaps are the missing or insufficient abilities, tools, or processes that limit the effectiveness of responders in preparing for, managing, and recovering from disasters.

 

They may relate to:

  • Operational procedures

  • Technology and interoperability

  • Training and preparedness

  • Communication with citizens

  • Cross-border cooperation

 

By systematically identifying these gaps, DIREKTION ensures that solutions developed or promoted truly enhance disaster resilience.

 

Why this matters?

 

Addressing these capability gaps requires coordinated action across policy, R&I, operational communities, and market uptake mechanisms. Priorities include investments in interoperability standards, joint validation environments, continuous training, and long-term capability planning to ensure European responder communities remain effective and resilient.

1730281344(2).jpg

Understanding and Addressing Europe’s Disaster Resilience Challenges

DIREKTION identifies and prioritises capability gaps that hinder effective prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery across Europe. Based on a three-cycle, practitioner-informed analysis, these gaps provide a shared reference for innovators, researchers, funders, and public authorities to align investments and accelerate operational uptake.

bottom of page